understudy / workload-fit
architecture diagnostic · local-only
Workload Optimization Matrix

Workload Readiness Diagnostic

Determine if your LLM pipeline is ready for prompt calibration, model distillation, and tiered routing.

Model optimization starts with measurement, not pricing.
Before swapping models or routing traffic, you need an eval contract you can trust.
1workload to baseline
1quality contract to protect
0telemetry bytes transmitted
01 / Scoping

Pick one production workload to baseline.

Optimization works best when isolated to a single repeated task with a measurable definition of quality. This diagnostic maps your workload pattern, eval maturity, operational bottlenecks, and fallback strategy to identify the highest-leverage path forward.

Before you start: Answer for one specific production workflow rather than your entire LLM stack. All processing is local to this browser tab—no data or telemetry is transmitted.
02 / Evaluation

Workload Optimization Diagnostic

Question 1 of 60%

Tip: Double-click or press Enter to advance
YOUR WORKLOAD PROFILE

Workload Profile & Optimization Route

Workload pattern

Eval readiness

Primary bottleneck

Fallback strategy

Recommended Day-1 Action (No Infra Changes)

Signal breakdown: Supporting signals indicate whether your pipeline is ready for automated evaluation, dataset distillation, or tiered routing.

Execution prerequisites

Production guardrails & fallback

03 / Architecture

Capture → Evaluate → Promote.

1. CaptureLog real production inputs, tool calls, schemas, and human corrections into a continuous dataset.
2. EvaluateFreeze a representative golden test set and automated scoring rules that represent true quality.
3. PromoteRoute traffic to candidate models only when they clear the quality threshold, with instant fallback.
A disciplined optimization loop protects baseline quality. Your primary frontier model serves as both the quality benchmark and the fallback route.
04 / Technical FAQ

Architecture, Integration & Security

How does Understudy integrate with our existing codebase?

Understudy operates via a standard OpenAI-compatible gateway proxy, local SDK client wrapper, or CLI workbench. You do not need to rewrite your agent logic or migrate pipelines—point your endpoint base URL or wrap your client to start capturing traces and evaluating routes.

What is an evaluation ("eval") harness?

An eval harness is an automated regression test suite for model outputs. It combines deterministic checks (JSON schema validation, regex, type constraints), programmatic domain assertions, and frozen golden datasets to score candidate models before deployment.

How does Understudy prevent quality regressions and silent failures?

Quality gating and tiered fallback. A candidate model or prompt only receives live traffic when it clears the held-out eval bar. If the specialized route encounters high uncertainty or a schema error, it automatically escalates to your frontier model baseline.

Where are models hosted and who owns the fine-tuned weights?

You own all resulting assets: prompts, evaluators, routing configurations, and specialized model weights. Models can be served within your private VPC (AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex, Fireworks, vLLM) or via managed inference.

How does this differ from generic prompt caching or semantic routers?

Caching only accelerates exact or near-identical queries. Understudy optimizes the entire execution route: prompt restructuring, tool-calling adapters, parameter compression, task-specific distillation, and dynamic complexity routing against measured evals.

Do we need weeks of labeling or custom training before seeing gains?

No. 50–100 production traces and 3–5 core validation assertions are sufficient to establish the first baseline. Major initial latency and cost gains often come from prompt optimization, structured output constraints, and tiered routing before model fine-tuning.